El rincón natural

martes, 9 de noviembre de 2010

Deep ocean species discovered

 

A new species has been discovered in one of the most remote and inaccessible parts of the ocean previously thought to be entirely free of fish. The new type of snailfish was found living at a depth of 7,000 metres in the Peru-Chile trench of the south-east Pacific Ocean.

Mass groupings of cusk-eels and large crustacean scavengers were also discovered living at these depths for the first time, the researchers said. The findings, in one of the deepest parts of the ocean on the planet, were made by a team of marine biologists from the University of Aberdeen, New Zealand and Japan.

The team used deep-sea imaging technology to take 6,000 pictures at depths between 4,500 metres and 8,000 metres within the trench. Alan Jamieson, who led the expedition said: “Our findings, which revealed diverse and abundant species at depths previously thought to be void of fish, will prompt a rethink into marine populations at extreme depths.”

This expedition was prompted by findings in 2008 and 2009 off Japan and New Zealand when the researchers discovered a new species of snailfish inhabiting trenches there with each trench home to its own species of the fish.

PIIS0960982210013473.gr1_lrg.hi

 Deep secrets: A snailfish discovered at a depth of 7,000 metres in the Peru-Chile trench. (Photo: Alan Jamieson, Oceanlab, University of Aberdeen.)

 

“To test whether these species would be found in all trenches, we repeated our experiments on the other side of the Pacific Ocean, some 6,000 miles from our last observations,” said Jamieson.

During the three-week expedition of the research vessel Sonne, the researchers used state-of-the-art deep-sea imaging technology, including an ultra-deep free-falling baited camera system, to take images deep into the trench.

A species of cusk eel gathered at the camera and fed on the bait for the full day of deployment. “Further research needs to be conducted to decipher whether this is an entirely new species of cusk eel that we have discovered,” the researchers said.

The expedition was the seventh to take place as part of Hadeep, a collaborative research project between the University of Aberdeen's Oceanlab, the University of Tokyo's Ocean Research Institute and with support from New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (Niwa). The Hadeep team has been investigating extreme depths across the globe for three years. The results have been photographs of the world's deepest-living fish for the first time.

The team also discovered a species of amphipod crustacean scavengers which they previously did not know existed at such depths and in such great numbers.

Niamh Kilgallen, an amphipod expert from Niwa said: “The sheer abundance of these big amphipods was overwhelming, particularly at 7,000–8,000 metres, which is much deeper than they have been found in any other trench. It begs the question of why and how they can live so deep in this trench but not in any other.”

These findings “prompt a re-evaluation of the diversity and abundance of life at extreme depths,” said Jamieson. “Each of the deep trenches across the globe hosts a unique assembly of animals which can differ greatly from trench to trench. The immense isolation of each trench draws parallels with island evolution popularised by Darwin's finches,” he said.

Current Biology, Volume 20, Issue 21, R909-R910, 9 November 2010

doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.043

http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(10)01347-3

Saludillos!

martes, 28 de septiembre de 2010

Prueba de Windows Live Writer

 

Este post es una prueba del software Windows Live Writer. Se supone que desde el sistema operativo de Windows es posible acceder a la página de tu blog y escribir entradas para su posterior publicación.

 

Así que allí voy, espero que esto funciones y de paso intentaré poner una imagen para ver si funciona también esto.

 

Saludillos!!

coafla

cinves

martes, 1 de junio de 2010

Uff.. sólo el comienzo o ya por fin a terminar? :P

Super chingón me gustaría comentar por esta entrada que por fin terminé de escribir mi tesis. Me siento algo preocupado porque me falta mi tutorial pero al menos estoy contento de que ya voy a terminar mi posgrado.

Aqui les dejo este wordle realizado con todo el texto propio de mi discusión y conclusiones.

Saludillos!!

Wordle: Phylogenetic_analysis

lunes, 12 de abril de 2010

Windows 7 TuneUp post


After a long period of no posting -again-, now I will spent this post on describing a software very useful for maintenance of your computer as well as to optimize it. Here you have a little description as well as the links for the website where you can find out more about this awesome software.

Windows 7 TuneUp

Windows 7 TuneUp suite is your all-purpose tool for better PC maintenance and security. Plus, it protects your computer from system crashes, repairs and maintains your PC health, removes unneeded Internet clutter, regains valuable disk space, cleans your registry and tweak windows to perform better.

Main Features:

* Support Windows XP/Vista/7
* Eliminates system crashes, freezes and slowdowns
* Automatically identifies and repairs common Windows problems
* Eliminate BSOD (Blue Screen of Death)
* Speeds up boot up time
* Repairs defects by building a fresh registry
* Compacts registry by removing gaps and unused space
* Removes fragmentation with a linear and sequential registry
* Improves system performance due to faster registry load/read
* Finds and deletes duplicate files of any type
* Saves space on your hard drive
* Extends internal system uninstaller with features to find and delete left traces (e,g registry keys, folders etc.)
* Improves your Windows PC's overall performance and stability
* Question based services and drivers tune up
* Automatically tweaks system services and drivers for better performance
* Recovers CPU & Memory usage taken by unneeded services and drivers
* Full control of the programs that are loaded during Windows startup
* Add/remove/edit startup items
* Task scheduler configurator
* Cleans Browser History
* Cleans history index.dat file content in Internet Explorer.

Feel free to get information about product here: WEBSITE

lunes, 28 de diciembre de 2009

I know, I know but this is interesting... Scientists. Do you believe in God?


I know I said something about my "last post of year" but I found something interesting that I wanted to post right now before the end of the year so we can think a little about it. It's not a post of mine, so, someway the former post will still be the last post of the year... my english still sucks... Hope you actually understood what I wrote above.

Well, here it goes. Hope you enjoy it the way I did.
Happy Holidays!

Source: Bitesize Bio

Perhaps at no other time of year like the winter solstice is the mixture of religious beliefs and daily life more intertwined. Most people, regardless of race and country of origin, come from a faith that believes in God or a Higher Power.

As scientists, it is a widely held belief that we do not believe in God because of our passion for truth. Some think that science and God do not mix and cannot mix; that you cannot be a scientist and actually believe in a higher power or a universal source of knowledge that is not measurable by any lab test.

My experience of what scientists believe

When I speak to my colleagues and friends in the science community, I actually find the opposite belief to be true. Most people I speak to not only believe in God, but in the paranormal, spiritual, and supernatural. We can’t measure any of this with a DNA or RNA test, yet for some, proof is not always something you can hold in your hand. What I have found is that for most scientists, their own experience is proof enough.

This makes sense to me because as scientists, we are trained to have an open mind and to not let our personal biases sway our results. Scientists need to be open to any and all possibility in order to make progress. So a scientist who has experienced divine guidance or intervention, while knowing that there is no explanation with physical laws on how such a thing could have happened, has all the evidence they need to know fact from fiction.

The stats

The stats say that the split is about 50-50 of those who believe in God and those who do not. A survey taken by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in May and June of this year and reported by David Masci in the Los Angeles Times, found that 51% do believe in God and 41% do not. These numbers haven’t changed much over the last 100 years either, despite the numerous discoveries in evolution and biochemistry over the years.

The same poll found that 41% of chemists believe in God while scientists in the fields of biology and medicine were much less likely to believe in God (32%). In terms of age, the younger generation of scientists (18-34) are more likely to believe in God than their senior colleagues.

In comparison, the scientific community tends to believe less that the general public do. 95% of American adults say they believe in a God or higher power and only 32% believe in evolution whereas 87% of scientists believe that life evolved over time.

Based on this data, it would suggest that for many of us, science and religion are not necessarily incompatible and one does not need to choose between the two. We can believe in a higher power and evolution. We can experience things not explainable by science and not need to write it down in a lab notebook as proof it happened.

Many of our scientific predecessors believed in God; Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627), Rene Descartes (1596-1650), Robert Boyle (1791-1867), Gregor Mendel (1822-1884), and Albert Einstein (1879-1955). Even under persecution for teaching that the sun was the center of the universe, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) maintained his faith in God. And Galileo had no proof that his theory was true using the tools available to him at the time.

Brilliant minds over the ages have recognized that there are some things we can’t explain but that doesn’t mean they aren’t true. Sometimes all you have to base your theories on is a hunch or a feeling or indirect evidence that there is more to this than meets the eye. Does it mean we reject everything that doesn’t fit our cozy model because we can’t measure it in a test tube? No. It means we keep an open mind until we can.

Here’s what I think

I love science because I love the process of solving the riddle and uncovering the clues to unraveling whatever problem I am trying to solve. I love the process of discovery and not just the end result. Fortunately for us scientists, there is an infinite number of puzzles to tackle in the universe and things to discover. Thank God for keeping a few things secret.
About the author:

Suzanne Kennedy
Suzanne is Director of R&D at a small biotech company in California. She has a PhD in Microbiology and Immunology from Virginia Commonwealth University.

I found this post very interesting because it's something everyone thinks and actually cares but just some people talk about. I must say I beleive in something more, something hidden, something that we cannot see with our eyes but we feel and try to understand not with our eyes, ears or senses but our soul perhaps (hope someone else believes in soul as well as I, hehe).

Saludillos!!
C'ya!

Nature

Science

Molecular Biology and Evolution - current issue

Genes & Development